Sentinels Split Back-to-Back with CYM Leopards
The ADS Sentinels battled through another back-to-back series this weekend, splitting games with the CYM Leopards, falling 99–90 in Game 1 before bouncing back with a strong 103–81 victory in Game 2.
The series showcased both the challenges of the road stretch and the team’s ability to respond with adjustments and resilience.
Game 1: Leopards 99, Sentinels 90
The Sentinels opened the weekend with a tough loss, as CYM capitalized on rebounding and second-chance opportunities to secure the 99–90 win.
Despite holding CYM to 37.9% shooting, the Sentinels were unable to overcome a 71–60 rebounding deficit and struggled offensively, shooting 37.9% from the field and just 16.7% from three-point range.
CYM also created separation at the free throw line, converting 25-of-44 attempts (56.8%).
Top Performers:
- T. Morton: 20 points, 11 rebounds, 9 assists
- B. Cortes: 15 points
- A. Crump: 9 points, 13 rebounds
- R. McGarthy Jr.: 10 points
The Sentinels showed effort defensively but were unable to string together consistent offensive runs to close the gap.
Game 2: Sentinels 103, Leopards 81
The Sentinels responded in a big way in Game 2, delivering a dominant 103–81 win behind improved efficiency and a more complete team performance.
The team shot 48.8% from the field, nearly a +11% improvement from Game 1, while holding CYM to just 34.6% shooting and limiting them to 81 total points.
Ball movement and control were key, as the Sentinels finished with 29 assists and a more balanced offensive attack.
Top Performers:
- N. Wek III: 13 points on 68.4% shooting, 8 rebounds
- A. Crump: 15 points, 8 rebounds, 8 assists
- A. Williams: 12 points, 10 rebounds
- T. Morton: 15 points, 5 assists
- D. Miller: 8 points, 9 rebounds
The Sentinels controlled the tempo early and never allowed CYM to establish rhythm, turning the game into one of their most complete performances of the season.
Series Takeaways
Several key differences defined the split:
- Rebounding Impact:
CYM dominated the glass in Game 1, but the Sentinels responded with improved effort and balance in Game 2. - Offensive Efficiency:
The Sentinels improved from 37.9% shooting in Game 1 to 48.8% in Game 2, leading to a decisive swing in outcome. - Ball Movement:
Increased assists and better offensive flow in Game 2 created higher-quality scoring opportunities. - Defensive Adjustments:
Holding CYM to 81 points in Game 2 reflected stronger defensive execution and control.
Response Matters
The ability to bounce back defined this weekend.
After a difficult Game 1, the ADS Sentinels responded with focus, execution, and a complete team effort in Game 2—demonstrating the resilience needed to compete at a high level.
As the season continues, that ability to adjust and respond will be critical in maintaining momentum and positioning for the postseason.